Yuu
|
|
« Reply #15 on: December 07, 2011, 08:50:11 am » |
|
I see.
And yeah, I'm planning to include that into the first draft, actually.
|
"That bastard is watching that **** playing with a ****" should actually be a perfectly polite sentence to describe a child watching a dog play with some sticks. But it's not, because they somehow became offensive.
|
|
|
|
Augustus
Newbie
Posts: 23
Morituri te salutant!
|
|
« Reply #16 on: December 07, 2011, 09:05:30 am » |
|
I don't think that would change the template much, your tech would be very different, but say you'd still have "infantry" just different. It's a template not a jail. Or am I getting it all wrong?
|
Memento mori.
|
|
|
Yuu
|
|
« Reply #17 on: December 07, 2011, 09:26:41 am » |
|
Don't worry.
This'll actually aid a lot so we could avoid, or intentionally create, situations where your footsoldier is unwittingly taking on what is supposed to be the other faction's MBT.
Basically, it'll help us know what we're
You might wanna drop terms like "infantry", "tank" and "artillery" though. Replace them instead with ambiguous stuff like "light reconnaisance", "heavy combat", "long range indirect fire" and the like.
|
"That bastard is watching that **** playing with a ****" should actually be a perfectly polite sentence to describe a child watching a dog play with some sticks. But it's not, because they somehow became offensive.
|
|
|
|